· Husband has healthy
sperms and Wife has healthy eggs but Wife cannot carry a baby to its full term.
For example, Aamir Khan’s wife Kiran Rao suffered a miscarriage earlier and had
uterine medical problems so the couple opted for surrogacy.
· In surrogacy: Wife’s egg
is fertilized with husband’s sperm through in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and an
embryo is created. (In Vitro=outside body. In-vivo=inside body.)
· This embryo is implanted
in the womb of a “surrogate mother”, she will carry It for nine months and
deliver the baby.
· Baby thus produced, will
have genetic make-up of the husband and wife (and not that of surrogate
mother.)
· The cost for a surrogate
and the entire procedure in India is one-third that in North America or Europe,
which makes India the favourite destination of the reproductive tourist
industry.
· Besides, Surrogacy is
banned in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Japan and Switzerland.
· Commercial surrogacy is
banned in New York and several other states in America, the UK, Canada, South
Africa and Australia. These countries allow what is called altruistic
surrogacy. (i.e. cannot be done for money)
· Indian surrogate mothers
are mainly from poor backgrounds or driven by circumstances, including
unemployment, domestic distress, etc,
· They offer their wombs on
commercial terms.
· Once the baby is born and
delivered, the surrogate mother is forgotten, the implications on her health
and mind are of no concern.
· It is not the health and
well-being of the surrogate, but the safe delivery of the baby that is of prime
concern.
· Recently, a surrogate
mother in Ahmedabad died because of medical complication.
· At present, in India,
there is no separate law to regulate the Egg donation and surrogacy clinics.
There are regulated by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) guidelines.
There is no centralized database of surrogate clinics or surrogate mothers.
· Problems may arise if
something goes wrong, for example baby is born with some defects and the
‘biological parents’ refuse to accept him/her, then Who is legally required to
keep the child? Who is the mother? Who is the father? What rights does each
possess, including future property disputes? There must a law to clearly
provide the answers.
· This bill aims to cover
the assisted reproduction clinics, gamete banks and surrogacy.
· It details the rights and
duties of all the parties involved in surrogacy and other assisted reproductive
technologies.
· It provides for advisory
and regulatory bodies at central and state levels.
· Regulators will be able
to receive and evaluate complaints and pass them on to a magistrate for trial,
if necessary.
· But it is still a “bill”
and not a “law”.
1.
Because of (relatively) cheap Surrogacy in India, less orphans
are getting adopted by well to do families abroad.
2.
Isn’t it self-indulgent to demand a “copy” of oneself, when so
many orphans stand in need of loving homes?
3.
The physical stress, risks, emotional and physical trauma to the
surrogate mother, and then the abrupt separation from the baby carried in the
womb for nine months are immaterial.
4.
(pro) Surrogate mother is asserting her independent agency to
make choices to better her life and those of her family. (anti) But what does
“choice” mean when she did not choose to be poor, she did not choose to be
unemployed, she did not choose to live in a country where children die of
starvation?
5.
It is inhumane to use a woman’s social and economic
vulnerability to commercially exploit her womb as a commodity to make handsome
profits.
6.
The use of surrogacy, especially the wide use, might lead to a
cheapening of our idea of what it is to be a person, to a decline in
self-respect. It might cause future generations, for example, to think of the
human embryo or fetus as interchangeable parts, reproduction as a mechanical
process, wombs as organs for rent, etc. The implication is that thinking of
ourselves in this fashion would bring serious negative consequences – the
“designer baby syndrome” for example, pick DNA of Sachin for Stamina, DNA of
Bacchan for Height, Hrithik Roshan for white skin and thus assemble an embryo
like assembling a mobile phone or computer.
1.
Surrogate mother is asserting her independent agency to make
choices to better her life and those of her family
2.
The argument given that less orphans are getting adopted- well
there is no reason why the infertile couple should have a special duty to adopt
needy children; those with their “own” could also adopt others If their
financial situation permits.
3.
If Government makes a law to ban surrogacy in India, then
market will go underground and the surrogate mothers would be exploited even
further, because they cannot approach the law enforcement agencies. So,
surrogacy should not be banned, it should be regulated
That's wonderful stuff you've written up here.
ReplyDeleteuterus removal specialist in bangalore | Gynaecology Hospitals in Bangalore